Miners reject State marketing of minerals – New Zimbabwe.com
“This policy on minerals marketing is premised on the notion that the private sector cannot be trusted,” the Chamber of Mines said. “The world over producers have the right to market their own minerals based on an approved marketing contract.” …
See all stories on this topic »
Yellow Fever new tourism board's marketing focus
“The country last experienced a Yellow Fever outbreak close to 20 years ago but the international community still perceives Kenya as prone to it,”KTB regional marketing manager Betty Ichan told the Business Daily. Kenyans have been subjected to demands …
See all stories on this topic »
Bridging Marketing and Finance Using Metrics.
Finance departments often criticize marketing's inability to present a tangible ROI and use financial measures. It's a common lament and one we've all heard. Rob Stuart, Executive Vice President & Publisher at CFO Publishing, in a recent conversation …
See all stories on this topic »
Popular Questions
Why do Zimbabwe miners reject State marketing of minerals?
The miners oppose proposals that would give the State greater control over the marketing and sale of minerals. Their concern is that centralized marketing could reduce producers’ control over buyers, prices, and payment arrangements. They are calling for a system that protects transparent transactions and allows miners to receive fair value for their output.
What are the miners’ main concerns about State marketing of minerals in Zimbabwe?
The main concerns involve pricing, transparency, payment delays, and the handling of mineral sales. Miners want clear rules showing how prices are determined and when producers will be paid. They also want assurances that any government role will not create unnecessary costs or limit access to legitimate markets.
What could happen if the State proceeds with marketing minerals despite the miners’ objections?
Miners could face reduced flexibility in choosing buyers and negotiating commercial terms. If the system is viewed as inefficient or unclear, it could discourage investment and encourage informal mineral trading. The dispute may be eased through consultation, published marketing rules, competitive pricing, and reliable payment procedures.